Mind and cosmos : why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false
(Book)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Published
New York : Oxford University Press, c2012.
Status
Central Library - Nonfiction - 2nd Floor
113 N
1 available

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
Central Library - Nonfiction - 2nd Floor113 NOn Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

About the Author, Reviews, Awards, and More

More Details

Published
New York : Oxford University Press, c2012.
Format
Book
Physical Desc
x, 130 pages ; 22 cm.
Language
English

Notes

Description
Argues that consciousness, intentionality, and value, all products of mind, are inadequately explained by standard materialist science, and that, therefore, standard materialist science is inadequate to provide the only way to understand the world. Devoted particularly to the origin of life from non-living matter and to the evolution of mind as problems for materialist science. Insists on a non-religious alternative.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos: why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false . Oxford University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Nagel, Thomas, 1937-. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Nagel, Thomas, 1937-. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False Oxford University Press, 2012.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Nagel, Thomas. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False Oxford University Press, 2012.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Loading Staff View.